P1vital CNS Experimental Medicine : ANXIETY

Background

The mechanisms underlying the anxiety disorders (including generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder and phobia) are not well understood. Anxiety disorders affect an estimated 73 million people worldwide and two pharmacological approaches to therapy are in routine clinical use. These are modulation of GABAA function by benzodiazepines and enhancement of serotonergic function by 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists (e.g. buspirone) and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The currently available therapies in these classes each have significant shortcomings. Use of benzodiazepines, which are highly effective anxiolytics with a rapid onset of action, is restricted by concerns over side effects, particularly their liability to induce drug dependence. By contrast the serotonergic compounds, which are generally thought to be free from dependence liability, are often less efficacious and may require 4-6 weeks of treatment to attain clinical efficacy. Delay in onset may lead to compliance failure. The clinical need therefore is for an anxiolytic with rapid efficacy but devoid of benzodiazepine-like side effects, particularly dependence liability. There is considerable potential for Experimental Medicine models to be used to select the best compounds for expensive late stage trials.

CO2 MODEL

In patients with panic disorder the anxiety resulting from a CO2 challenge has been shown to be sensitive to treatment with acute or chronic treatment with the benzodiazepine alprazolam. Although much of the published literature on CO2 -induced anxiety has focused on panic anxiety in patients with panic disorder researchers at Bristol led by Prof David Nutt have recently reported that the inhalation of 7.5% CO2 in healthy subjects produces an increase in blood pressure and heart rate, and increased feelings of anxiety, fear and tension (Bailey et al 2005). The model has been validated with the benzodiazepine lorazepam and the results replicated in a number of independent studies. Recently the SSRI paroxetine has also been shown to have positive effects in this model.

DENTAL PHOBIA

Dental phobia affects about 20% of the population leading to dental neglect. Eventually, patients in whom dental neglect results in chronic pain present to hospital dental units where treatment is normally administered under sedation.
Not surprisingly patients with dental phobia have high levels of anxiety on the day of the procedure; which can be effectively reduced by alprazolam. However, recently obtained pilot data suggests that levels of anxiety increase in the days leading up to treatment. These data indicate that anxiety levels begin to increase approximately 3-4 days before the procedure and peak immediately before surgery begins. The advantage of this assay is that the anxiety induced is pathological and chronic with a low signal to noise ratio.

EMOTION POTENTIATED STARTLE

Antidepressants that inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (SSRIs) or noradrenaline are effective in the treatment of disorders such as depression and anxiety. Cognitive theories emphasize the importance of correcting negative biases of information processing in the non-pharmacological treatment of these disorders, but it is not known whether antidepressant drugs can directly modulate the neural processing of affective information. Consequently, researchers in Oxford led by Prof Guy Goodwin have assessed the actions of repeated antidepressant administration on perception and memory for positive and negative emotional information in healthy volunteers. Forty-two male and female volunteers were randomly assigned to 7 days of double-blind intervention with the SSRI citalopram (20 mg/day), the selective noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine (8 mg/day), or placebo. On the final day, facial expression recognition, emotion- potentiated startle response, and memory for affect-laden words were assessed. Questionnaires monitoring mood, hostility, and anxiety were given before and after treatment. In the facial expression recognition task, citalopram and reboxetine reduced the identification of the negative facial expressions of anger and fear. Citalopram also abolished the increased startle response found in the context of negative affective images. Both antidepressants increased the relative recall of positive (versus negative) emotional material. These changes in emotional processing occurred in the absence of significant differences in ratings of mood and anxiety. However, reboxetine decreased subjective ratings of hostility and elevated energy. The effects of citalopram on the processing of fear are consistent with a role for the amygdala in SSRI action. The amygdala plays a primary role in the enhanced startle response during fear, largely characterized in animal models, but supported by studies of patients with amygdala damage. Thus fear potentiated startle may provide an alternative method for assessing the action of novel antidepressants.

For more information on CO2, Dental Phobia and EPS models or to discuss anxiety studies contact Info@p1vital.com