P1vital
CNS Experimental Medicine : ANXIETY
Background
The mechanisms underlying the anxiety disorders (including
generalised anxiety disorder, panic disorder, obsessive compulsive
disorder and phobia) are not well understood. Anxiety disorders
affect an estimated 73 million people worldwide and two pharmacological
approaches to therapy are in routine clinical use. These are modulation
of GABAA function by benzodiazepines and enhancement of serotonergic
function by 5-HT1A receptor partial agonists (e.g. buspirone) and
selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs). The currently available
therapies in these classes each have significant shortcomings. Use
of benzodiazepines, which are highly effective anxiolytics with
a rapid onset of action, is restricted by concerns over side effects,
particularly their liability to induce drug dependence. By contrast
the serotonergic compounds, which are generally thought to be free
from dependence liability, are often less efficacious and may require
4-6 weeks of treatment to attain clinical efficacy. Delay in onset
may lead to compliance failure. The clinical need therefore is for
an anxiolytic with rapid efficacy but devoid of benzodiazepine-like
side effects, particularly dependence liability. There is considerable
potential for Experimental Medicine models to be used to select
the best compounds for expensive late stage trials.
CO2 MODEL
|
In
patients with panic disorder the anxiety resulting from a
CO2 challenge has been shown to be sensitive to treatment
with acute or chronic treatment with the benzodiazepine alprazolam.
Although much of the published literature on CO2 -induced
anxiety has focused on panic anxiety in patients with panic
disorder researchers at Bristol led by Prof David Nutt have
recently reported that the inhalation of 7.5% CO2 in healthy
subjects produces an increase in blood pressure and heart
rate, and increased feelings of anxiety, fear and tension
(Bailey et al 2005). The model has been validated with the
benzodiazepine lorazepam and the results replicated in a number
of independent studies. Recently the SSRI paroxetine has also
been shown to have positive effects in this model.
|
|
|
DENTAL PHOBIA
Dental phobia affects
about 20% of the population leading to dental neglect. Eventually,
patients in whom dental neglect results in chronic pain present
to hospital dental units where treatment is normally administered
under sedation.
Not surprisingly patients with dental phobia have high levels of anxiety
on the day of the procedure; which can be effectively reduced by alprazolam.
However, recently obtained pilot data suggests that levels of anxiety
increase in the days leading up to treatment. These data indicate that
anxiety levels begin to increase approximately 3-4 days before the procedure
and peak immediately before surgery begins. The advantage of this assay
is that the anxiety induced is pathological and chronic with a low signal
to noise ratio.
|
EMOTION POTENTIATED STARTLE
| Antidepressants that
inhibit the reuptake of serotonin (SSRIs) or noradrenaline
are effective in the treatment of disorders such as depression
and anxiety. Cognitive theories emphasize the importance
of correcting negative biases of information processing in
the non-pharmacological treatment of these disorders, but
it is not known whether antidepressant drugs can directly
modulate the neural processing of affective information.
Consequently, researchers in Oxford led by Prof Guy Goodwin
have assessed the actions of repeated antidepressant administration
on perception and memory for positive and negative emotional
information in healthy volunteers. Forty-two male and female
volunteers were randomly assigned to 7 days of double-blind
intervention with the SSRI citalopram (20 mg/day), the selective
noradrenaline reuptake inhibitor reboxetine (8 mg/day), or
placebo. On the final day, facial expression recognition,
emotion- potentiated startle response, and memory for affect-laden
words were assessed. Questionnaires monitoring mood, hostility,
and anxiety were given before and after treatment. In the
facial expression recognition task, citalopram and reboxetine
reduced the identification of the negative facial expressions
of anger and fear. Citalopram also abolished the increased
startle response found in the context of negative affective
images. Both antidepressants increased the relative recall
of positive (versus negative) emotional material. These changes
in emotional processing occurred in the absence of significant
differences in ratings of mood and anxiety. However, reboxetine
decreased subjective ratings of hostility and elevated energy.
The effects of citalopram on the processing of fear are consistent
with a role for the amygdala in SSRI action. The amygdala
plays a primary role in the enhanced startle response during
fear, largely characterized in animal models, but supported
by studies of patients with amygdala damage. Thus fear potentiated
startle may provide an alternative method for assessing the
action of novel antidepressants.
For more information
on CO2, Dental Phobia and EPS models or to
discuss anxiety studies contact Info@p1vital.com
|
| |